SZ/OEMU/28/1/1 - Note on protection of personnel against small bomb splinters, 9/39
SZ/OEMU/28/1/1
Item
Note on protection of personnel against small bomb splinters, 9/39
1939
2 leaves
R.C. 42
Since 95% of a bomb case is dispersed in fragments of less than a gram in weight, it is suggested that a lower degree of protection would be sufficient to reduce personnel casualties. Materials for armour are discussed. The pros and cons of sand as a material are mentioned. The possibility of using harder materials like granular corundum (emery), periclase (magnesium oxide) or carborundum is discussed.
Since 95% of a bomb case is dispersed in fragments of less than a gram in weight, it is suggested that a lower degree of protection would be sufficient to reduce personnel casualties. Materials for armour are discussed. The pros and cons of sand as a material are mentioned. The possibility of using harder materials like granular corundum (emery), periclase (magnesium oxide) or carborundum is discussed.
-
SZ - Zuckerman Archive
-
SZ/OEMU - Ministry of Home Security, Oxford Extra-Mural Unit
-
SZ/OEMU/28 - [OEMU. CDRC - Splinters, 1939-1945]
-
SZ/OEMU/28/1 - [OEMU. CDRC - Splinters: protection of personnel, tests of various materials, etc., 1939-1942]
- SZ/OEMU/28/1/1 - Note on protection of personnel against small bomb splinters, 9/39
-
SZ/OEMU/28/1 - [OEMU. CDRC - Splinters: protection of personnel, tests of various materials, etc., 1939-1942]
-
SZ/OEMU/28 - [OEMU. CDRC - Splinters, 1939-1945]
-
SZ/OEMU - Ministry of Home Security, Oxford Extra-Mural Unit
Previous Item
Next Item